Is Ankeny or Davenport Safer?
According to crimebycity.com's analysis of 2024 FBI data, Ankeny is safer than Davenport (Safety Score 67/100 vs 8/100), with a total crime rate of 1,188 per 100,000 versus 4,123 for Davenport — 71% lower. Ankeny has lower rates in 7 of 7 crime categories.
The biggest difference is in murder, where Ankeny has a 100% lower rate.
Ankeny — 5-Year Trend
Violent
Property
Total
Davenport — 5-Year Trend
Violent
Property
Total
Ankeny, IA
Davenport, IA
Detailed Crime Rate Comparison
| Crime Type | Ankeny | Davenport | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total Crime Rate | 1,187.5 | 4,123.1 | -2,935.5 |
| Violent Crime Rate | 165.9 | 582.4 | -416.5 |
| Murder Rate | 0.0 | 8.0 | -8.0 |
| Rape Rate | 40.5 | 108.1 | -67.6 |
| Robbery Rate | 6.5 | 65.1 | -58.5 |
| Aggravated Assault Rate | 118.9 | 400.3 | -281.4 |
| Property Crime Rate | 1,021.6 | 3,540.6 | -2,519.0 |
| Burglary Rate | 64.0 | 653.5 | -589.5 |
| Larceny-Theft Rate | 872.7 | 2,555.9 | -1,683.2 |
| Motor Vehicle Theft Rate | 84.9 | 331.3 | -246.3 |
All rates per 100,000 residents. Source: FBI UCR 2024.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Ankeny or Davenport safer?
Ankeny is safer with a total crime rate of 1,188 per 100K vs 4,123 for Davenport — a 71% difference.
How do violent crime rates compare?
Ankeny has a violent crime rate of 165.9 per 100K while Davenport has 582.4. Ankeny has lower violent crime.
About Ankeny, IA
Ankeny, a suburb north of Des Moines, was founded as a railway stop. Its population has rapidly expanded, making it one of Iowa's fastest-growing cities. With a safety score of 67/100 and a population coverage of 76,547, Ankeny has a total crime rate of 1,187.5 per 100,000 residents.
About Davenport, IA
Davenport, Iowa, one of the Quad Cities, sits on the Mississippi River's west bank. It's home to Palmer College of Chiropractic, the first chiropractic school. The city's population is diverse, with a notable Hispanic community. With a safety score of 8/100 and a population coverage of 99,926, Davenport has a total crime rate of 4,123.1 per 100,000 residents.