Is Gardena or Jonesboro Safer?
According to crimebycity.com's analysis of 2024 FBI data, Gardena is safer than Jonesboro (Safety Score 10/100 vs 10/100), with a total crime rate of 3,755 per 100,000 versus 3,765 for Jonesboro — 0% lower. Gardena has lower rates in 4 of 7 crime categories.
The biggest difference is in robbery, where Jonesboro has a 69% lower rate.
Gardena — 5-Year Trend
Violent
Property
Total
Jonesboro — 5-Year Trend
Violent
Property
Total
Gardena, CA
Jonesboro, AR
Detailed Crime Rate Comparison
| Crime Type | Gardena | Jonesboro | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total Crime Rate | 3,754.5 | 3,764.7 | -10.1 |
| Violent Crime Rate | 703.3 | 720.0 | -16.6 |
| Murder Rate | 5.2 | 6.2 | -0.9 |
| Rape Rate | 27.8 | 103.4 | -75.6 |
| Robbery Rate | 201.4 | 61.5 | +139.9 |
| Aggravated Assault Rate | 468.9 | 548.9 | -80.0 |
| Property Crime Rate | 3,051.2 | 3,044.7 | +6.5 |
| Burglary Rate | 422.0 | 929.2 | -507.2 |
| Larceny-Theft Rate | 1,727.9 | 1,892.8 | -164.9 |
| Motor Vehicle Theft Rate | 901.3 | 222.8 | +678.5 |
All rates per 100,000 residents. Source: FBI UCR 2024.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Gardena or Jonesboro safer?
Gardena is safer with a total crime rate of 3,755 per 100K vs 3,765 for Jonesboro — a 0% difference.
How do violent crime rates compare?
Gardena has a violent crime rate of 703.3 per 100K while Jonesboro has 720.0. Gardena has lower violent crime.
About Gardena, CA
Gardena, a South Bay city, was once a major strawberry producer. Its diverse population includes a significant Japanese American community. With a safety score of 10/100 and a population coverage of 57,584, Gardena has a total crime rate of 3,754.5 per 100,000 residents.
About Jonesboro, AR
Jonesboro, a regional hub in Northeast Arkansas, sits at the intersection of the Ozark Foothills and the Mississippi Alluvial Plain. Home to Arkansas State University, it blends agricultural heritage with a growing urban landscape. With a safety score of 10/100 and a population coverage of 81,256, Jonesboro has a total crime rate of 3,764.7 per 100,000 residents.