Is Carol Stream or Midland Safer?
According to crimebycity.com's analysis of 2024 FBI data, Midland is safer than Carol Stream (Safety Score 82/100 vs 82/100), with a total crime rate of 780 per 100,000 versus 780 for Carol Stream — 0% lower. Carol Stream has higher rates in 2 of 7 crime categories.
The biggest difference is in robbery, where Midland has a 70% lower rate.
Carol Stream — 5-Year Trend
Violent
Property
Total
Midland — 5-Year Trend
Violent
Property
Total
Carol Stream, IL
Midland, MI
Detailed Crime Rate Comparison
| Crime Type | Carol Stream | Midland | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total Crime Rate | 780.3 | 779.6 | +0.7 |
| Violent Crime Rate | 69.8 | 124.1 | -54.3 |
| Murder Rate | 2.6 | 2.3 | +0.2 |
| Rape Rate | 31.0 | 39.8 | -8.8 |
| Robbery Rate | 7.8 | 2.3 | +5.4 |
| Aggravated Assault Rate | 28.4 | 77.3 | -48.8 |
| Property Crime Rate | 710.5 | 655.6 | +55.0 |
| Burglary Rate | 98.2 | 51.5 | +46.7 |
| Larceny-Theft Rate | 534.8 | 580.6 | -45.8 |
| Motor Vehicle Theft Rate | 77.5 | 23.4 | +54.1 |
All rates per 100,000 residents. Source: FBI UCR 2024.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Carol Stream or Midland safer?
Midland is safer with a total crime rate of 780 per 100K vs 780 for Carol Stream — a 0% difference.
How do violent crime rates compare?
Carol Stream has a violent crime rate of 69.8 per 100K while Midland has 124.1. Carol Stream has lower violent crime.
About Carol Stream, IL
Carol Stream, a DuPage County village named for its founder's daughter, spans prairie land west of Chicago. It's home to a diverse population and significant industrial parks. With a safety score of 82/100 and a population coverage of 38,703, Carol Stream has a total crime rate of 780.3 per 100,000 residents.
About Midland, MI
Midland, home to Dow Chemical since 1897, is a city in Michigan's Lower Peninsula with a predominantly white population. It sits at the confluence of the Tittabawassee and Chippewa rivers. With a safety score of 82/100 and a population coverage of 42,712, Midland has a total crime rate of 779.6 per 100,000 residents.