Is Indianapolis or San Francisco Safer?
According to crimebycity.com's analysis of FBI data, Indianapolis is safer than San Francisco (Safety Score 7/100 vs 6/100), with a total crime rate of 4,214 per 100,000 versus 4,526 for San Francisco — 7% lower. Indianapolis has lower rates in 4 of 7 crime categories.
The biggest difference is in murder, where San Francisco has a 78% lower rate.
Quiz: which of these is SAFER than Indianapolis, IN?
Indianapolis — 5-Year Trend
Violent
Property
Total
San Francisco — 5-Year Trend
Violent
Property
Total
Indianapolis, IN
San Francisco, CA
Detailed Crime Rate Comparison
| Crime Type | Indianapolis | San Francisco | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total Crime Rate | 4,214.4 | 4,525.6 | -311.2 |
| Violent Crime Rate | 878.3 | 596.5 | +281.8 |
| Murder Rate | 20.0 | 4.4 | +15.6 |
| Rape Rate | 59.2 | 34.9 | +24.3 |
| Robbery Rate | 143.2 | 267.2 | -124.0 |
| Aggravated Assault Rate | 655.6 | 290.1 | +365.5 |
| Property Crime Rate | 3,336.1 | 3,929.1 | -593.0 |
| Burglary Rate | 517.9 | 637.5 | -119.6 |
| Larceny-Theft Rate | 2,072.1 | 2,618.9 | -546.8 |
| Motor Vehicle Theft Rate | 746.1 | 672.7 | +73.3 |
All rates per 100,000 residents. Source: FBI UCR.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Indianapolis or San Francisco safer?
Indianapolis is safer with a total crime rate of 4,214 per 100K vs 4,526 for San Francisco — a 7% difference.
How do violent crime rates compare?
Indianapolis has a violent crime rate of 878.3 per 100K while San Francisco has 596.5. San Francisco has lower violent crime.
About Indianapolis, IN
About San Francisco, CA
San Francisco, a vibrant Northern California port city renowned for its iconic Golden Gate Bridge, spans a hilly peninsula. Home to a diverse population of nearly 850,000, it was a pivotal center of the counterculture movement in the 1960s. With a safety score of 6/100 and a population coverage of 802,856, San Francisco has a total crime rate of 4,525.6 per 100,000 residents.