Is Belton or Paso Robles Safer?
According to crimebycity.com's analysis of 2024 FBI data, Belton is safer than Paso Robles (Safety Score 35/100 vs 35/100), with a total crime rate of 2,207 per 100,000 versus 2,221 for Paso Robles — 1% lower. Belton has higher rates in 3 of 6 crime categories.
The biggest difference is in robbery, where Paso Robles has a 23% lower rate.
Belton — 5-Year Trend
Violent
Property
Total
Paso Robles — 5-Year Trend
Violent
Property
Total
Belton, MO
Paso Robles, CA
Detailed Crime Rate Comparison
| Crime Type | Belton | Paso Robles | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total Crime Rate | 2,206.6 | 2,221.3 | -14.7 |
| Violent Crime Rate | 333.9 | 364.3 | -30.4 |
| Murder Rate | 0.0 | 0.0 | +0.0 |
| Rape Rate | 76.8 | 64.5 | +12.3 |
| Robbery Rate | 46.1 | 35.5 | +10.6 |
| Aggravated Assault Rate | 211.1 | 264.4 | -53.3 |
| Property Crime Rate | 1,872.8 | 1,857.0 | +15.8 |
| Burglary Rate | 88.3 | 151.5 | -63.3 |
| Larceny-Theft Rate | 1,592.6 | 1,602.3 | -9.7 |
| Motor Vehicle Theft Rate | 191.9 | 103.2 | +88.7 |
All rates per 100,000 residents. Source: FBI UCR 2024.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Belton or Paso Robles safer?
Belton is safer with a total crime rate of 2,207 per 100K vs 2,221 for Paso Robles — a 1% difference.
How do violent crime rates compare?
Belton has a violent crime rate of 333.9 per 100K while Paso Robles has 364.3. Belton has lower violent crime.
About Belton, MO
Belton, Missouri, a city in Cass County, grew with the arrival of the Kansas City Southern Railway. It's home to roughly 24,000 residents, situated south of Kansas City. With a safety score of 35/100 and a population coverage of 26,058, Belton has a total crime rate of 2,206.6 per 100,000 residents.
About Paso Robles, CA
Paso Robles, a town known for its hot springs since the Salinan people, lies in California's Central Coast region. Its population of around 32,000 residents contributes to a growing wine industry. With a safety score of 35/100 and a population coverage of 31,018, Paso Robles has a total crime rate of 2,221.3 per 100,000 residents.