Is Burnsville or Yuba City Safer?
According to crimebycity.com's analysis of 2024 FBI data, Yuba City is safer than Burnsville (Safety Score 38/100 vs 38/100), with a total crime rate of 2,084 per 100,000 versus 2,098 for Burnsville — 1% lower. Burnsville has lower rates in 4 of 7 crime categories.
The biggest difference is in robbery, where Burnsville has a 77% lower rate.
Burnsville — 5-Year Trend
Violent
Property
Total
Yuba City — 5-Year Trend
Violent
Property
Total
Burnsville, MN
Yuba City, CA
Detailed Crime Rate Comparison
| Crime Type | Burnsville | Yuba City | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total Crime Rate | 2,098.4 | 2,083.6 | +14.8 |
| Violent Crime Rate | 209.7 | 425.2 | -215.5 |
| Murder Rate | 7.7 | 5.9 | +1.8 |
| Rape Rate | 44.7 | 73.3 | -28.6 |
| Robbery Rate | 17.0 | 74.8 | -57.8 |
| Aggravated Assault Rate | 140.3 | 269.8 | -129.5 |
| Property Crime Rate | 1,888.7 | 1,658.4 | +230.3 |
| Burglary Rate | 101.8 | 168.6 | -66.9 |
| Larceny-Theft Rate | 1,662.0 | 1,236.1 | +426.0 |
| Motor Vehicle Theft Rate | 124.9 | 253.7 | -128.8 |
All rates per 100,000 residents. Source: FBI UCR 2024.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Burnsville or Yuba City safer?
Yuba City is safer with a total crime rate of 2,084 per 100K vs 2,098 for Burnsville — a 1% difference.
How do violent crime rates compare?
Burnsville has a violent crime rate of 209.7 per 100K while Yuba City has 425.2. Burnsville has lower violent crime.
About Burnsville, MN
Burnsville, a southern suburb of Minneapolis, is home to Buck Hill, a popular ski area. The city's population is diverse, with a notable East African community. With a safety score of 38/100 and a population coverage of 64,860, Burnsville has a total crime rate of 2,098.4 per 100,000 residents.
About Yuba City, CA
Yuba City, a agricultural hub in the Sacramento Valley, sits near the Feather River. It's home to a significant Sikh population, reflected in its cultural landscape. With a safety score of 38/100 and a population coverage of 68,200, Yuba City has a total crime rate of 2,083.6 per 100,000 residents.