Is Jackson or Salisbury Safer?
According to crimebycity.com's analysis of 2024 FBI data, Jackson is safer than Salisbury (Safety Score 4/100 vs 4/100), with a total crime rate of 4,810 per 100,000 versus 4,947 for Salisbury — 3% lower. Jackson has lower rates in 4 of 7 crime categories.
The biggest difference is in murder, where Jackson has a 68% lower rate.
Jackson — 5-Year Trend
Violent
Property
Total
Salisbury — 5-Year Trend
Violent
Property
Total
Jackson, MI
Salisbury, NC
Detailed Crime Rate Comparison
| Crime Type | Jackson | Salisbury | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total Crime Rate | 4,810.5 | 4,947.5 | -137.0 |
| Violent Crime Rate | 1,074.8 | 960.0 | +114.8 |
| Murder Rate | 9.8 | 30.1 | -20.3 |
| Rape Rate | 159.6 | 57.4 | +102.2 |
| Robbery Rate | 68.4 | 145.0 | -76.6 |
| Aggravated Assault Rate | 824.0 | 727.5 | +96.5 |
| Property Crime Rate | 3,735.7 | 3,987.5 | -251.9 |
| Burglary Rate | 491.8 | 402.0 | +89.8 |
| Larceny-Theft Rate | 2,901.9 | 2,762.3 | +139.6 |
| Motor Vehicle Theft Rate | 342.0 | 823.2 | -481.2 |
All rates per 100,000 residents. Source: FBI UCR 2024.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Jackson or Salisbury safer?
Jackson is safer with a total crime rate of 4,810 per 100K vs 4,947 for Salisbury — a 3% difference.
How do violent crime rates compare?
Jackson has a violent crime rate of 1,074.8 per 100K while Salisbury has 960.0. Salisbury has lower violent crime.
About Jackson, MI
Jackson, Michigan, a city in the south-central Lower Peninsula, is historically known as the birthplace of the Republican Party. It has a diverse population of approximately 31,000 residents. With a safety score of 4/100 and a population coverage of 30,704, Jackson has a total crime rate of 4,810.5 per 100,000 residents.
About Salisbury, NC
Salisbury, NC, home to Cheerwine, is a city of over 35,000 residents in Rowan County. It sits in the Piedmont region, roughly midway between Charlotte and Greensboro. With a safety score of 4/100 and a population coverage of 36,564, Salisbury has a total crime rate of 4,947.5 per 100,000 residents.