Is Lancaster or Pasco Safer?
According to crimebycity.com's analysis of 2024 FBI data, Lancaster is safer than Pasco (Safety Score 28/100 vs 27/100), with a total crime rate of 2,531 per 100,000 versus 2,547 for Pasco — 1% lower. Lancaster has lower rates in 4 of 7 crime categories.
The biggest difference is in murder, where Pasco has a 100% lower rate.
Lancaster — 5-Year Trend
Violent
Property
Total
Pasco — 5-Year Trend
Violent
Property
Total
Lancaster, OH
Pasco, WA
Detailed Crime Rate Comparison
| Crime Type | Lancaster | Pasco | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total Crime Rate | 2,530.8 | 2,547.1 | -16.3 |
| Violent Crime Rate | 405.4 | 351.3 | +54.1 |
| Murder Rate | 12.0 | 0.0 | +12.0 |
| Rape Rate | 86.4 | 27.2 | +59.2 |
| Robbery Rate | 16.8 | 54.4 | -37.6 |
| Aggravated Assault Rate | 290.3 | 266.0 | +24.3 |
| Property Crime Rate | 2,125.4 | 2,195.8 | -70.4 |
| Burglary Rate | 194.3 | 295.7 | -101.3 |
| Larceny-Theft Rate | 1,808.7 | 1,457.2 | +351.5 |
| Motor Vehicle Theft Rate | 122.3 | 442.9 | -320.5 |
All rates per 100,000 residents. Source: FBI UCR 2024.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Lancaster or Pasco safer?
Lancaster is safer with a total crime rate of 2,531 per 100K vs 2,547 for Pasco — a 1% difference.
How do violent crime rates compare?
Lancaster has a violent crime rate of 405.4 per 100K while Pasco has 351.3. Pasco has lower violent crime.
About Lancaster, OH
Lancaster, Ohio, founded in 1800, is a city in Fairfield County known for being the birthplace of General William Tecumseh Sherman. Situated along the Hocking River, its population hovers around 40,000 residents. With a safety score of 28/100 and a population coverage of 41,687, Lancaster has a total crime rate of 2,530.8 per 100,000 residents.
About Pasco, WA
Pasco, a Tri-Cities hub, sits at the confluence of the Snake and Columbia Rivers. Rich in agricultural heritage, it boasts a diverse population, including a significant Hispanic community. With a safety score of 27/100 and a population coverage of 80,838, Pasco has a total crime rate of 2,547.1 per 100,000 residents.