Is Niles or Port Arthur Safer?
According to crimebycity.com's analysis of 2024 FBI data, Port Arthur is safer than Niles (Safety Score 34/100 vs 33/100), with a total crime rate of 2,258 per 100,000 versus 2,278 for Niles — 1% lower. Niles has lower rates in 4 of 7 crime categories.
The biggest difference is in murder, where Niles has a 100% lower rate.
Niles — 5-Year Trend
Violent
Property
Total
Port Arthur — 5-Year Trend
Violent
Property
Total
Niles, IL
Port Arthur, TX
Detailed Crime Rate Comparison
| Crime Type | Niles | Port Arthur | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total Crime Rate | 2,278.4 | 2,258.3 | +20.2 |
| Violent Crime Rate | 55.0 | 718.5 | -663.5 |
| Murder Rate | 0.0 | 10.8 | -10.8 |
| Rape Rate | 6.9 | 68.6 | -61.7 |
| Robbery Rate | 27.5 | 108.3 | -80.8 |
| Aggravated Assault Rate | 20.6 | 530.7 | -510.1 |
| Property Crime Rate | 2,223.4 | 1,539.8 | +683.7 |
| Burglary Rate | 419.3 | 415.2 | +4.1 |
| Larceny-Theft Rate | 1,697.7 | 913.4 | +784.2 |
| Motor Vehicle Theft Rate | 106.5 | 211.2 | -104.7 |
All rates per 100,000 residents. Source: FBI UCR 2024.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Niles or Port Arthur safer?
Port Arthur is safer with a total crime rate of 2,258 per 100K vs 2,278 for Niles — a 1% difference.
How do violent crime rates compare?
Niles has a violent crime rate of 55.0 per 100K while Port Arthur has 718.5. Niles has lower violent crime.
About Niles, IL
Niles, Illinois, a northern Chicago suburb, is home to a replica of the Leaning Tower of Pisa. This diverse village sits near the North Branch of the Chicago River, with a population exceeding 30,000 residents. With a safety score of 33/100 and a population coverage of 29,099, Niles has a total crime rate of 2,278.4 per 100,000 residents.
About Port Arthur, TX
Port Arthur, Texas, a Gulf Coast city, saw its oil industry boom with the Lucas Gusher at Spindletop. Situated in Jefferson County, it's part of the Golden Triangle urban area. With a safety score of 34/100 and a population coverage of 55,397, Port Arthur has a total crime rate of 2,258.3 per 100,000 residents.