Is Mason or New Milford Safer?
According to crimebycity.com's analysis of 2024 FBI data, Mason is safer than New Milford (Safety Score 90/100 vs 90/100), with a total crime rate of 565 per 100,000 versus 567 for New Milford — 0% lower. Mason has lower rates in 4 of 6 crime categories.
The biggest difference is in robbery, where Mason has a 100% lower rate.
Mason — 5-Year Trend
Violent
Property
Total
New Milford — 5-Year Trend
Violent
Property
Total
Mason, OH
New Milford, CT
Detailed Crime Rate Comparison
| Crime Type | Mason | New Milford | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total Crime Rate | 565.1 | 567.4 | -2.3 |
| Violent Crime Rate | 36.2 | 28.2 | +8.0 |
| Murder Rate | 0.0 | 0.0 | +0.0 |
| Rape Rate | 19.5 | 17.6 | +1.9 |
| Robbery Rate | 0.0 | 3.5 | -3.5 |
| Aggravated Assault Rate | 16.7 | 7.1 | +9.7 |
| Property Crime Rate | 528.9 | 539.2 | -10.3 |
| Burglary Rate | 5.6 | 52.9 | -47.3 |
| Larceny-Theft Rate | 523.3 | 426.4 | +96.9 |
| Motor Vehicle Theft Rate | 0.0 | 59.9 | -59.9 |
All rates per 100,000 residents. Source: FBI UCR 2024.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Mason or New Milford safer?
Mason is safer with a total crime rate of 565 per 100K vs 567 for New Milford — a 0% difference.
How do violent crime rates compare?
Mason has a violent crime rate of 36.2 per 100K while New Milford has 28.2. New Milford has lower violent crime.
About Mason, OH
Mason, Ohio, a suburb north of Cincinnati, is home to Kings Island amusement park. This city in Warren County has experienced significant population growth, attracting families and businesses. With a safety score of 90/100 and a population coverage of 35,923, Mason has a total crime rate of 565.1 per 100,000 residents.
About New Milford, CT
New Milford, Connecticut, a picturesque town bisected by the Housatonic River, boasts the largest town green in the state. Its population of around 28,000 residents enjoys a blend of rural charm and suburban amenities. With a safety score of 90/100 and a population coverage of 28,377, New Milford has a total crime rate of 567.4 per 100,000 residents.